Hiring Policy
Substitute License(s):
Colorado offers 1-year, 3-year and 5-year
substitute authorizations.
A 1-year authorization requires a high school diploma or a GED, and a 3-year authorization requires a bachelor's degree. The 5-year authorization requires a valid or expired Colorado or out-of-state license.
Length of Assignment:
Colorado does not specify the maximum consecutive days a substitute can teach in the same classroom assignment.
Evaluation of Long-term Substitutes:
Colorado has no requirements for the evaluation of any of its substitute teachers. Colorado state policy is unclear on whether substitutes with a 5-year authorization and a valid Colorado teaching license would be subject to evaluation under the state's current teacher evaluation requirements.
Distinguish requirements for short-term and long-term substitutes.
Colorado should distinguish requirements for short-term and long-term substitutes so that it can ensure that its requirements are appropriate for the needs of these teachers.The state's long-term substitute requirements should be rigorous (e.g., that all long-term substitutes have current or expired licenses) to help
ensure that teachers who are spending extended periods of time with
students are prepared to do so.
Limit the number of consecutive days a short-term substitute can teach in the same classroom.
Colorado should limit the number of consecutive days a short-term substitute can teach in the same classroom without completing additional requirements or obtaining a long-term substitute license. The maximum number of days should be no more than 10 percent of the length of the school year. Colorado's policy does not limit the number of consecutive days a substitute may teach in the same classroom, and may be detrimental to
instructional quality and daily productivity.
Require long-term substitute teachers to be evaluated.
Colorado should maintain standards for substitute teacher quality and accountability for all substitutes, but especially for long-term substitutes who are expected to stand in for licensed teachers for extended periods of time. Colorado can help ensure that substitute teachers are held to high standards and have access to the supports necessary to improve their practice by
requiring evaluations—which it may find appropriate to modify from its
standard, state-required teacher evaluations—of long-term
substitutes.
Colorado recognized the factual accuracy of this analysis.
Research finds that teacher absences negatively affect student achievement and growth.[1] While some of this is attributable to the disruption of regular classroom practices and instruction,[2] it may also be attributable to substitute teacher quality. The gap in instructional quality and daily productivity when a regular teacher is replaced by a substitute teacher is significant.[3] However, absences covered by substitutes licensed by the state are not as detrimental to student achievement as those covered by non-licensed substitutes.[4] Some research hypothesizes that the low-skill level and mobility of substitute teachers may contribute to the reduction in instructional focus and quality and that even when substitute teachers are good instructors, they may be unable to effectively implement a teacher of record's long-term instructional strategies.[5] Parents, teachers, principals, and students have concerns about substitute teachers' quality and qualifications.[6] States should maintain rigorous standards for substitute teacher quality and accountability for all substitutes, but especially for long-term substitutes who are expected to stand in for teachers for long stretches of time.