Elementary Teacher Preparation Policy
Content Test Requirements: South Carolina only requires its early childhood education teacher candidates, who are licensed to teach elementary grades through grade 3, to pass
the Praxis II Education of Young Children (5024) test, which may assess pedagogy but is not an adequate measure of subject-matter knowledge.
Scientifically Based Reading Instruction: As a condition of initial licensure, South Carolina does not require its early childhood candidates to pass a
reading test addressing the five instructional components of scientifically
based reading instruction. However, South Carolina does require teacher preparation programs for early childhood teacher candidates to address the science of reading. All early childhood teacher candidates are required to
complete a twelve-credit-hour sequence in literacy that
includes "comprehension, oral language, phonological awareness, phonics,
fluency,
and vocabulary."
Informational Texts: The Education of Young Children test incorporates some of the instructional shifts in the use of text
associated with the state's college- and career-readiness standards for
students. The test requires that a teacher knows "how to develop children's
ability to comprehend literature, informational texts, and other types of texts."
Teachers must also know "scaffolding strategies to support children's
progress toward independent reading toward the high end of their text
complexity band (e.g., providing access to grade level texts, purposeful
grouping)." The state's literacy competencies for grades PreK-5 also require teachers to be able to "use knowledge of text complexity and student interests
to match books to readers and help students select texts with which they
will be successful."
Literacy Skills: With regard to the incorporation of literacy skills in the core content areas, South Carolina's literacy competencies for PreK-5 teachers states; "Connecting
inquiry through the integration of Social Studies, Science, and Math,
with literacy instruction leads students to build knowledge and
emphasizing collaborative learning fosters independence and
self-initiation in reading and learning." The state then lists
competencies for teachers to meet the standard. The Education of Young Children test also vaguely addresses literacy skills in other core areas by requiring a teacher to know "strategies to integrate literacy into the content areas (e.g., mathematics, social studies, science, and the arts)."
South Carolina also requires that all teacher preparation programs "ensure that all teacher education candidates possess the knowledge and skills to assist effectively all children in becoming proficient readers," and "prioritize their missions and resources so all early and elementary education teachers have the knowledge and skills to provide effective instruction in reading and numeracy to all students."
Struggling Readers: South Carolina's teacher preparation programs are required to "ensure that all teacher candidates are skilled in diagnosing a child's
reading problems and are capable of providing an effective
intervention."
Require early childhood
teacher candidates to pass a subject-matter test designed to ensure sufficient content
knowledge of all subjects.
South Carolina should require all early childhood education teacher candidates, who are licensed to teach elementary grades, to pass an elementary content test appropriately aligned with its college- and career-readiness standards. South Carolina should require a subject-matter test that includes separate, meaningful passing scores for each core subject, including reading/language arts, math, science and social studies.
Require all teacher candidates who teach
elementary grades to pass a rigorous assessment in the science of reading
instruction.
South Carolina should require a rigorous reading assessment tool to ensure that its
early childhood candidates are adequately prepared in the science of reading
instruction before entering the classroom. The assessment should clearly test
knowledge and skills related to the science of reading and address all five
instructional components of scientifically based reading instruction: phonemic
awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. If the test is
combined with an assessment that also tests general pedagogy or elementary
content, it should report a subscore for the science of reading specifically.
Early childhood teachers who do not possess the minimum knowledge in this area
should not be eligible for licensure.
South Carolina stated that the effectiveness of teacher candidates in providing content to learners in clinical practice is assessed through the ADEPT formative and summative evaluation processes.
(For more on the state's work to ensure that its teachers have high-quality clinical practice experiences, please see the student teaching/clinical practice goal 1-E.)
2D: Elementary Licensure Deficiencies
Early childhood teachers who teach elementary grades must be ready for the demands of the elementary classroom. Many states have early childhood licenses that include some elementary classroom grades, usually up to grade three.[1] Because teachers with this early childhood license can still teach many elementary grades, they should not be held to a lower bar for subject-matter knowledge than if they held more standard elementary licenses. Given the focus on building students' content knowledge and vocabulary in college- and career-readiness standards,[2] states would put students at risk by not holding all elementary teachers to equivalent standards.[3] That is not to say the license requirements must be identical; there are certainly different focuses in terms of child development and pedagogy. But the idea that content knowledge is only needed by upper-grade elementary teachers is clearly false.
Focus on reading instruction is especially critical for early childhood teachers. Although some states do not ensure that any elementary teachers know the science of how to teach young children to read, in the states where this is a priority, it is inexcusable to hold elementary teachers on an early childhood license to a lower standard. Research is clear that the best defense against reading failure is effective early reading instruction.[4] Therefore, if such licenses are neglecting to meet the needs of the early elementary classroom, of which learning to read is paramount, they are failing to meet one of their most fundamental purposes.