Expanding the Pool of Teachers Policy
The Pennsylvania Teacher Intern Certification program requires candidates to
enroll in a university/college preparation program. Candidates must complete
nine credits per year to maintain certification. Institutions of higher
education must provide flexible and accelerated pedagogical training to
teachers in the Intern program.
Once candidates in the American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence
(ABCTE) program have earned the Passport to Teaching credential, they may apply
for the Temporary Teaching Permit. Under this permit candidates complete two
continuing education seminars/workshops and two graduate-level education
pedagogy courses.
The state requires alternate route providers of a Teacher Intern Program to
offer a minimum of one classroom observation each month. ABCTE candidates
receive mentor support.
The intern certificate is valid for three years after which candidates are
eligible for a standard license. ABCTE candidates complete the program in two
years and may apply for a standard license.
Establish coursework guidelines for alternate route preparation programs.
Simply mandating coursework without specifying the purpose
can inadvertently send the wrong message to program providers—that
"anything goes" as long as credits are granted. However constructive,
any course that is not fundamentally practical and immediately necessary should
be eliminated as a requirement. Appropriate coursework should include
grade-level or subject-level seminars, methodology in the content area,
classroom management, assessment and scientifically based early reading
instruction.
Ensure program completion in fewer than two years.
While ABCTE candidates qualify for standard certification in
two years, Pennsylvania should consider shortening the length of time it takes
a Teacher Intern to earn standard certification. The route should allow
candidates to earn full certification no later than the end of the second year
of teaching.
Strengthen the induction experience for new teachers.
While Pennsylvania is commended for requiring all new
teachers to work with a mentor, there are insufficient guidelines indicating
that the mentoring program is structured for new teacher success. Effective
induction strategies include practice teaching prior to teaching in the
classroom, intensive mentoring with full classroom support in the first few
weeks or months of school, a reduced teaching load and release time to allow new
teachers to observe experienced teachers during each school day.
Pennsylvania noted that its law allows for noncollege and university postbaccalaureate programs for certification as of 2011. Currently, there are 15 programs in different content areas. These programs must go through the same rigorous review process as traditional programs.
Alternate route
programs must provide practical, meaningful preparation that is sensitive to a
new teacher's stress level.
Too many states have policies requiring alternate route
programs to "backload" large amounts of traditional education
coursework, thereby preventing the emergence of real alternatives to
traditional preparation. This issue is especially important given the large
proportion of alternate route teachers who complete this coursework while
teaching. Alternate route teachers often have to deal with the stresses of
beginning to teach while also completing required coursework in the evenings and
on weekends. States need to be careful to require participants only to meet
standards or complete coursework that is practical and immediately helpful to a
new teacher.
Induction support is
especially important for alternate route teachers.
Most new teachers—regardless of their preparation—find
themselves overwhelmed on taking responsibility for their own classrooms. This
is especially true for alternate route teachers, who may have had considerably
less classroom exposure or pedagogy training than traditionally prepared
teachers. While alternate route programs will ideally have provided at least a
brief student teaching experience, not all programs can incorporate this into
their models. States must ensure that alternate route programs do not leave new
teachers to "sink or swim" on their own when they begin teaching.
Alternate Route Preparation: Supporting Research
For
a general, quantitative review of the research supporting the need for states
to offer an alternate route license, and why alternate routes should not be
treated as programs of "last resort," one need simply to look at the
numbers of uncertified and out of field teachers in classrooms today, readily
available from the National Center for Education Statistics. In addition, with
U.S. schools facing the need to hire more than 3.5 million new teachers each
year, the need for alternate routes to certification cannot be underestimated.
See also E.R. Ducharme and M.K. Ducharme, "Quantity and quality: Not enough to go around." Journal of
Teacher Education, Volume 49, No. 3, May 1998, pp. 163-164.
Further,
scientific and market research demonstrates that there is a willing and able
pool of candidates for alternate certification programs—and many of these
individuals are highly educated and intelligent. In fact, the nationally
respected polling firm, The Tarrance Group, recently conducted a scientific
poll in the State of Florida, identifying that more than 20 percent of
Floridians would consider changing careers to become teachers through alternate
routes to certification.
We
base our argument that alternative-route teachers should be able to earn full
licensure after two years on research indicating that teacher effectiveness
does not improve dramatically after the third year of teaching. One study
(frequently cited on both sides of the alternate route debate) identified that
after three years, traditional and alternatively-certified teachers demonstrate
the same level of effectiveness, see J.W. Miller, M.C. McKenna, and B.A. McKenna, "A comparison of alternatively and traditionally prepared teachers". Journal of Teacher Education, Volume 49, No. 3, May 1998, pp. 165-176. This finding is
supported by D. Boyd, D. Goldhaber, H. Lankford, and J. Wyckoff, "The Effect of Certification and Preparation on Teacher Quality." The Future of Children, Volume 17, No. 1, Spring 2007, pp. 45-68.
Project
MUSE (http://muse.jhu.edu/), found that student achievement was
similar for alternatively-certified teachers as long as the program they came
from was "highly selective."
The
need for a cap on education coursework and the need for intensive mentoring are
also backed by research, as well as common sense. In 2004, Education Commission
of the States reviewed more than 150 empirical studies and determined that
there is evidence "for the claim that assistance for new teachers, and, in
particular, mentoring [have] a positive impact on teachers and their retention."
The 2006 MetLife Survey of the American Teacher validates these conclusions. In
addition, Mathematica (2009) found that student achievement suffers when
alternate route teachers are required to take excessive amounts of coursework.
See An Evaluation of Teachers Trained
Through Different Routes to Certification: Final Report at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504313.pdf
See
also Alternative Certification Isn't Alternative (NCTQ, 2007)
at: http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/Alternative_Certification_Isnt_Alternative_20071124023109.pdf.