Teacher Compensation Policy
Requirements: Kentucky explicitly allows districts to differentiate the amount of salary increases or increments based on the following: National Board for Professional Teaching certification, school-based performance; or credit for professional non-teaching experience or military service.
Encourage districts to compensate new teachers with relevant prior work experience.
While still leaving districts with the flexibility to
determine their own pay scales, Kentucky should encourage districts to incorporate
mechanisms such as starting these teachers at a higher salary than other new
teachers. Such policies would be attractive to career changers with related
work experience, such as in the STEM subjects.
Kentucky declined to respond to NCTQ's analyses.
8C: Prior Work
Districts should be allowed to pay new teachers with relevant work experience more than other new teachers. State and district salary structures frequently fail to recognize that new teacher hires are not necessarily new to the workforce.[1] Some new teachers bring with them deep work experience that is directly related to the subject matter they will teach.[2] For example, the hiring of a new high school chemistry teacher with 20 years' experience as a chemical engineer would likely be a great boon to any district.[3] Yet most salary structures would place this individual at the same point on the pay schedule as a new teacher straight out of college. Compensating these teachers commensurate with their experience is an important recruitment and retention strategy, particularly when other, non-teaching opportunities in these fields are likely to be more financially lucrative.[4]
Specifics of teacher pay should largely be left to local decision making. However, states should use policy mechanisms to inform districts that it is not only permissible, but also necessary, to compensate new teachers with relevant prior work experience.