Elementary Teacher Preparation Policy
Scientifically Based Reading Instruction—Tests and Standards:
As a condition of initial licensure, Alabama requires all elementary teacher candidates to pass the Praxis Teaching Reading (5204) test, which addresses the five instructional components of scientifically based reading instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
Alabama's Quality Teaching Standards also address the science of reading instruction.
Informational Texts:
Elementary teacher candidates in Alabama must be prepared for the key instructional shifts related to literacy that
differentiate college- and career-readiness standards from their predecessors. Elementary teachers are required to pass the Praxis II Elementary
Education: Multiple Subjects (5001) test. The reading and language arts
subtest includes some of the instructional shifts toward building
content knowledge and vocabulary through careful reading of
informational and literary texts associated with these standards.
However, although the framework now addresses complex texts, it does so
only in the context of measuring text complexity and does not
address how to also incorporate increasingly complex texts into
instruction.
The Teaching Reading test framework includes only a vague reference
to "recognizing the differences in kinds of texts and their various
uses."
Literacy Skills:
The Alabama Quality Teacher Standards
state that "effective teachers...model and actively teach their students the fundamentals of reading, writing, and oral communications across all content areas." The standards require that teachers must have the "ability to integrate reading
instruction into all content areas that one teaches." However, these standards do not ensure that teachers are fully prepared to include literacy skills across the core content areas.
Struggling Readers:
Alabama's Teaching Reading assessment indirectly
addresses struggling readers by requiring that a teacher "understands a
variety of strategies to differentiate instruction" and "uses assessment
data to inform instruction."
Alabama's teacher standards require "knowledge of assessment tools to
monitor the acquisition of reading strategies, to improve reading
instruction, and to identify students who require additional
instruction." However, these standards do not go far enough to ensure that teachers are fully prepared to identify and support struggling readers.
Ensure that new elementary teachers are prepared to incorporate informational text of increasing complexity into classroom instruction.
Alabama's use of the Multiple Subjects test is a step in the right direction.
However, neither the Multiple Subjects framework nor the framework for
the state's Teaching Reading test adequately captures all the major
instructional shifts of college- and career-readiness standards.
Alabama is therefore encouraged to strengthen its teacher preparation
requirements and ensure that all candidates who teach the elementary
grades have the ability to address the use of informational texts as
well as incorporate complex informational texts into classroom
instruction.
Ensure that new elementary teachers are prepared to incorporate literacy skills as an integral part of every subject.
To ensure that elementary students are capable of accessing varied information about the world around them, Alabama should also—either through testing frameworks or teacher standards—more specifically include literacy skills and using text to build content knowledge in history/social studies, science, technical subjects and the arts.
Support struggling readers.
Alabama should articulate more specific
requirements ensuring that elementary teachers are prepared to
intervene and support students who are struggling. The early elementary
grades are an especially important time to address reading deficiencies
before students fall behind.
Monitor new reading assessment to ensure adequacy and rigor.
Although it is commendable that Alabama now requires elementary teacher candidates to demonstrate knowledge of reading instruction, the test selected by the state is actually intended for reading specialists and accordingly spans the entire K-12 spectrum. The state should monitor this assessment to make sure it really is rigorous and an appropriate measure of teachers' knowledge of and skill in scientifically based early reading instruction. The track record of Praxis assessments in this regard is mixed at best, and the K-12 span might make it possible for candidates to achieve the passing score without sufficient knowledge and skills for the elementary classroom.
Alabama recognized the factual accuracy of this analysis, however this analysis was updated subsequent to the state's review.
2C: Teaching Elementary Reading
Teaching children to read is the most important task teachers undertake. Over the past 60 years, scientists from many fields have worked to determine how people learn to read and why some struggle. This science of reading has led to breakthroughs that can dramatically reduce the number of children destined to become functionally illiterate or barely literate adults, identifying five components of effective instruction. In fact, most reading failure can be avoided by routinely applying the lessons learned from the scientific findings in the classroom. Estimates indicate that the current failure rate of 20 to 30 percent could be reduced to 2 to 10 percent.[1]
Scientific research has shown that there are five essential components of effective reading instruction: explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.[2] Many states' policies still do not reflect the strong research consensus in reading instruction that has emerged over the last few decades. Many teacher preparation programs resist teaching scientifically-based reading instruction. Reports by NCTQ on teacher preparation, beginning with What Education Schools Aren't Teaching about Reading and What Elementary Teachers Aren't Learning in 2006 and continuing through the Teacher Prep Review in 2016 have consistently found the overwhelming majority of teacher preparation programs across the country do not train teachers in the science of reading, although the most recent Teacher Prep Review did find signs of improvement.[3] Whether through standards or coursework requirements, states must direct programs to provide this critical training. But relying on programs alone is insufficient; states must only grant licenses to new elementary teachers who can demonstrate they have the knowledge and skills to teach children to read.
Most current reading tests do not offer assurance that teachers know the science of reading. A growing number of states, such as Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Virginia, require strong, stand-alone assessments entirely focused on the science of reading.[4] Other states rely on either pedagogy tests or content tests that include items on reading instruction. However, since reading instruction is addressed only in one small part of most of these tests, it is often not necessary to know the science of reading to pass.[5] States need to make sure that a teacher candidate cannot pass a test that purportedly covers reading instruction without knowing the critical material.
College- and career-readiness standards require significant shifts in literacy instruction. College- and career-readiness standards for K-12 students adopted by nearly all states require from teachers a different focus on literacy integrated into all subject areas. The standards demand that teachers are prepared to bring complex text and academic language into regular use, emphasize the use of evidence from informational and literary texts and build knowledge and vocabulary through content-rich text. While most states have not ignored teachers' need for training and professional development related to these instructional shifts, few states have attended to the parallel need to align teacher competencies and requirements for teacher preparation so that new teachers will enter the classroom ready to help students meet the expectations of these standards.[6]